Citizen as a book of Twitter Poetry

Rankine’s Citizen provided challenges for me, as someone who is not as familiar with poetry, but what was particularly interesting to me was Rankine’s use of images on the page. These visual breaks on the page seemed to reflect the experience of the speaker, in which these situations are interruptions of her lived experience in sudden and unexpected ways. What I mean by this is I could not find a pattern to when Rankine placed images on the page, nor could I always figure out why she placed a particular image between particular poems. However, this I interpreted to mean that the visual breaking up of text is a reflection of the breaking of the speaker’s experience from one of being to one of being written upon. In the same way that the speaker experienced these encounters with her friends and colleagues, who either gave “well-meaning advice” or tried including them in their racism, the reader of this book encounters these disruptions of the reading experience with visual representations. There was also the use of stills in the poems paired with the situation videos, which was another interesting use of translating movement and moving media onto the unmoving pages of a book.

This also seemed quite interesting from the perspective of someone who is active on social media, as it seemed reminiscent of black use of social media, in particular twitter. Black twitter’s use of pictures and gifs to accompany the text they have written to express a full range of emotion seems reflected here in Rankine’s book. It is also interesting to see how a very versatile, mobile medium is expressed on the static page of a book. In other words, twitter provides active discourse and actual movement (with the use of gifs, for example), which Rankine, who is using a printed book, is limited by what a page can display. The formatting of the poems on the page also seemed to me to be reminiscent of the twitter display, as viewing the tweets on a phone screen reflects the set up of Rankine’s poems. It is a rectangle of text on the upper half of the page (or screen) which may or may not be accompanied by images and which is often without a title (and often even without the space for a title). The book, then, uses a very visual medium that is recognized as a black space for communication and translates it to print.

Non-standard English and the Blank Page

What was particularly interesting for me about Brathwaite was idea behind the project of capturing sound on the page. Now, as someone who has mostly grown up with access to computers it is not as strange to me to think of translating non-standard English from sound to writing. It’s still complicated, and incredibly difficult, but it was not something that occurred to me as a huge problem. However, upon reading the Brathwaite and Kirschenbaum, and seeing Brathwaite’s poems, the plurality of this issue became clear to me. It’s quite fascinating how Brathwaite captures rhythm and dialect on the page, but when it was read in class it did not read as smoothly as one might have expected. This issue of oral to written to oral again piqued my interest.

The problem, then, spans several levels. One is that of authenticity, and here I think in particular of Chesnutt and his use of the black voice to be “authentic” (though he is, of course, only one of many). Capturing dialect on the page can be distorted and abused in many ways, particularly as English is such a tool of empire and any English that deviates from the “standard” or “proper” form is seen as inferior. To capture dialect on the page, then, could be seen as offensive given that the author felt the need to portray the character’s “broken English” on the page. As often happens, the dialect on the page does not accurately reflect how a person of that background might speak and ends up being a mangled, caricature-esque representation of what that dialect was actually like. It also make the text incredibly difficult to understand, as the author often mangles English so much to create a brokenness on the page that it no longer becomes legible, which leads to the impression that non-standard dialects of English, even in the spoken form, are unintelligible to the speaker and writer of standard English.

Another level is that of truth. If it is someone who actually speaks a certain dialect of English, then it makes for a more nuanced representation of what that form of English is like, as Brathwaite does for Caribbean English. As a speaker of that form of English, he understands the conventions of it and does not mangle, in the same way a white or non-Caribbean author word, the dialect itself. For prescriptivists, he could be mangling the English language, but he is staying true to the dialect.

But then there is the question of whether or not dialect should even be presented on the page. On one hand, to not show dialect on the page and merely say the character had a dialect would allow the reader to forget that the character speaks a different form of English. On the other hand, to show the “broken” qualities of non-standard English would be to improperly represent this form of English. It then begs the question of whether it is worse to have representation, if it is of poor quality, or to not have any representation at all. A solution to this, though it has its drawbacks, is to allow authors from underrepresented communities write the stories, rather than those who are white, but it unfairly puts all the work on the shoulders of minority authors. There is no easy solution to this, but it is a problem I find interesting nonetheless.

Should Bigger Have Been Innocent?

The answer (for me) is yes, Bigger should’ve been innocent. The reason why the novel didn’t resonate as much with me was because of the fact that Bigger was actually guilty. I understand that the novel is supposed to show how it is society’s fault that Bigger ended up in the position of killing two women, however, I think the injustice of the system shows more efficiently if Bigger is innocent. That’s not to say that Bigger’s worth is lessened because he committed those crimes, but it feels like protesting the system when you’re actually guilty just seems less efficient. It would also be more effective because it’s the reality. Black men are far more likely to be incarcerated regardless of their innocence, and perhaps, arguably, in spite of it. A black man is afforded less doubt when it comes to the crimes he has allegedly committed. It is true that Wright was trying to draw attention to how the system is flawed and how exactly it is rigged against black men, but it seemed to fall flat given that Bigger actually committed the crimes he was accused of. Not only was Bigger guilty, but the crimes were incredibly violent. It wasn’t just that he’d murdered two women, but also that he’d hacked one to pieces to hide her body and he raped the other. These were extremely violent, extremely graphic crimes, and it just felt like trying to protest the system with a character as flawed as Bigger just didn’t work. Bigger was also too flawed; to protest the system it wasn’t necessary to have a perfect character, a saintly martyr, but I felt that Bigger was too far on the other side of the spectrum.

Perhaps I am also clouded by the perspective of someone living in 2018. There is far more focus on the Prison Industrial Complex, as well as the brutal killings of black men at the hands of the police. Black men are assumed guilty even when proven innocent. Therefore the discourse surrounding Bigger in the novel seems untrue. It is not entirely that Jan and Max are trying to prove that Bigger is innocent, but they are absolving him of the responsibility of having committed the crime and placing the blame on the system. Now, I’m not arguing that the system wasn’t against Bigger, because it was and is, but Bigger, especially in the rape and murder of Bessie, was the sole agent in brutalizing this woman. Bessie’s assumption that the system, that people will assume Bigger raped Mary before killing her is actually proven true because Bigger raped and killed Bessie. That is to say, it became a self-fulfilling prophecy, but Bigger did not have to rape and kill Bessie. Mary’s death was an accident, but the brutalization of Bessie was not. It is this brutal treatment of women, this incredible violence which makes me believe that Bigger is not as effective as Wright wants him to be as proof that the system is prejudiced against black men.

Annotated Bibliography

Abbandonato, Linda. “‘A View From ‘Elsewhere’’: Subversive Sexuality and the Rewriting of the Heroine’s Story in The Color Purple” PMLA, Vol. 106, No. 5. Modern Language Association (Oct. 1991), pp. 1109-1115.

▪︎ Abbandonato explores Celie’s voice, specifically as it is expressed in writing, as challenging heterosexual, patriarchal subjectivity. The author does so by analyzing The Color Purple as well as the novel Clarissa, with the intention of highlighting the drastic difference in identity/background for women with fairly similar life experiences.

Babb, Valerie. “The Color Purple: Writing to Undo What Writing Has Done” Phylon (1960-), Vol. 47, No. 2. Clark Atlanta University (2nd Qtr., 1986), pp. 107-116.

▪︎ The author is exploring the relationship and power dynamic in black v. white, man v. woman, and oral v. literary with the main characters in The Color Purple. Babb analyzes the characters of Celie and Nettie as black women who “reorganize the hierarchy” and therefore free themselves from the dominant (white heterosexual male) power structures. The author pays special attention to letter writing as the medium of the narrative.

Fox, Catherine O., Ore, Tracy E. “(Un)Covering Normalized Gender and Race Subjectivities in LGBT ‘Safe Spaces’” Feminist Studies, Vol. 36, No. 3, SEX AND SURVEILLANCE. Feminist Studies, Inc. (Fall 2010), pp. 629-649.

▪︎ Fox and Ore trace the origin of safe spaces and the concept of safety. In this exploration, they analyze and deconstruct the inherent privilege in safe spaces and how that relates to the creation of safe spaces in marginalized communities. The authors also firmly root the concept of safety in the world of white, heterosexual meaning, and how this safety is achieved “at the expense of many women.”

Lewis, Christopher S. “Cultivating Black Lesbian Shamelessness: Alice Walker’s The Color Purple” Rocky Mountain Review, Vol. 66, No. 2. Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association (Fall 2012), pp. 158-175.

▪︎ Lewis looks at the relationship between black lesbian writers and the Black Arts Movement of the ‘80s, specifically at the notions of femininity and homosexuality and inherently detrimental to the fight against oppression. The author uses The Color Purple as a case study of the celebration of same-sex black relationships.

Selzer, Linda. “Race and Domesticity in The Color Purple” African American Review, Vol. 29, No. 1. Indiana State University (Spring 1995), pp. 67-82.

▪︎ Selzer analyzes and criticizes the negative interpretations of domesticity in Alice Walker’s novel. The author argues against the degradation of the role of domesticity and personal/domestic narratives of black women characters through the life of Celie.

Final Project Proposal: Writing Identity

As a basis for my project, I would like to use the evolution of the character of Celie in Alice Walker’s The Color Purple. The change in Celie’s voice is quite dramatic, and it reflects the growing formation of identity throughout the novel. Celie begins the novel as an inscriptive surface; her ideas about herself stem only from what others think of her. Her writing is also reflective of a sense of being “unformed” in that Celie makes many mistakes, and writes exactly as she speaks. This lack of “proper” education, that is education in a school setting, does not mean Celie isn’t influenced by the white supremacist and patriarchal ideals that would have been instilled in her in an educational setting. However, throughout the novel, Celie begins an exploration of self, of identity, that she had not previously had the luxury to do. In conjunction with this exploration of identity, Celie’s writing changes. The language she uses, even who she addresses (as this book is written as a series of letters between Celie and her sister Nettie), changes alongside her exploration of identity. With this idea of writing as a space for identity formation, I have two ideas that I would like to explore.

The first would be a look back, an exploration of texts written by enslaved black women and texts written by black women in the immediacy of post-Civil War America. It would provide what might be a more straightforward correlation between learning to write and identity formation. What would most interest me is to see not just what they use to write, but what they write about, even the more banal subjects. It would be interesting to see if there is a sense of thematic progression from writing about ideas imposed on them to writing about their own ideas.

The second idea is a look at the present, particularly at identity formation and online spaces. This would be a more interactive approach, as I might include a forum or google form or some other questionnaire for people to fill out. Specifically, I would want to explore the relationship between black LGBT women and writing spaces. In the era of the internet, it would be interesting to see how black LGBT women, who bear the brunt of marginalization on multiple fronts, consider different media for communication. Given that black women, especially black LGBT women, are often ignored or silenced in favor of voices that are closer to the white cishet “norm,” I would like to explore their relationship to the internet as a place to be heard. This new kind of inscription could be both positive (black LGBT women have a space to finally express and explore their identities) and negative (black LGBT women are still shunned or silenced by non-black, cishet voices, or the options for identity expression are so many they feel overwhelmed).

 

Possible Sources

Finding a Place in Cyberspace: Black Women, Technology, and Identity – Michelle M. Wright

The Color Purple: Writing to Undo What Writing Has Done – Valerie Babb

Evaluating the Severity of Hate-motivated Violence: Intersectional Differences Among LGBT Hate Crime Victims – Doug Meyer

Intersectionality, Heteronormativity, and Black Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LBGT) Families – Juan Battle and Colin Ashley

The Impact of Community Involvement, Religion, and Spirituality on Happiness and Health among a National Sample of Black Lesbians – Juan Battle and Alfred DeFreece

(Un)Covering Normalized Gender and Race Subjectivities in LGBT “Safe Spaces” – Catherine O. Fox and Tracy E. Ore

Fluctuations in the Religiosity of Black Writing

My intent with this project was to gauge if there was some fluctuation in religious ideas as it related to the social circumstances. The three terms I plugged in were faith, salvation, and repentance. With the entire corpus, it was difficult to get a sense of a pattern. Although faith and pattern sometimes coincided, repentance followed its own rhythm. The fluctuations in salvation and faith also seems more significant and drastic than for repentance. However, since the corpus is so large, it is difficult to get a sense of the context and how it changes. Faith, the most numerous, has a total of 3,754 occurrences. Salvation has a total of 757, also making it difficult to get a sense of the context. With repentance, even though it has 142 occurrences, it is still hard to get a sense of the context.

When I plugged these same terms into the Douglass corpus, the amount of data was far more manageable. Faith, the most numerous, appeared a total of 105, with a steady but minimal growth from the first version of the autobiography to the third. The changing context of faith is interesting, as it fluctuates between the secular use of faith and the religious. In the religious context, it most often pops up with a negation before it, as in “no faith” or “lack of faith.” Salvation, in the few times it appears, is used in both a religious and secular context, speaking both of the salvation of the union and the salvation by Jesus Christ. It also steadily decreases over time. Repentance, curiously, does not appear at all in the first version of the autobiography. As is visible in the graph, it is used most in the second version, then decreases again. The context of repentance was interesting, as it was mostly negative. Douglass often spoke of the lack of repentance, or the absence of the sincerity and humility of proper repentance.

In the women’s corpus, faith followed the pattern of being the most numerous of the terms with a total of 285 occurrences. What is most interesting about faith is the two very significant spikes in usage, while the rest of it fluctuates quite regularly. Some of the most common words that preceded or followed faith related to transformation, triumph, richness of faith, and strength. Salvation mirrors almost exactly the trajectory of faith, though it occurs only 108 times. The major spikes in usage perfectly overlap, which was very interesting. The context of salvation was quite similar as well, in writing about full and great salvation. The last term, repentance, surprisingly only occurred a total of 16 times. Repentance appeared in the context of “true” repentance, and of a calling for/to repentance.

The difficulty in drawing conclusions from such a project was the lack of specifics. The interface of the graph made it difficult to get an exact date and exact document for each (more so for the entire corpus). However, this would be an interesting way to start a project, as the trends of these words seem to be very closely aligned. A more thorough investigation into the historical and social contexts of the times, of the exact years in which these spikes in occurrence happened would pave the way for a very interesting project.

Intersections of blackness and “nerd culture”

For anyone who is a fan of the “nerdy” genres out there (sci-fi/fantasy), I’ve linked a blog I like to read by “Afro-Caribbean-American” writer Phenderson Djèlí Clark, who offers his critique of characters of color, particularly black characters, in movies, shows, and books in the sci-fi and fantasy genres. He tends to be fairly intersectional and writes quite often about women characters of color as well!

Blog + Twitter

Discourse and Intellectual Labor in Douglass

The two ideas I’ll talk about are fairly related, so I’ll begin with one that was referenced in a class discussion, which I believe nicely sets up the other point. Discourse is always in the arena, in the playing field of the oppressor. That is to say, any marginalized group, by the very fact of its marginalization, can only communicate in the language and medium of the oppressor. Even language that is meant to subvert or break the power dynamic is doing so in relation to the original power structure. The vocabulary and medium of the oppressor must be used in order for those in power to recognize the argument, movement, group, etc., or else it is not viewed as legitimate discourse. It is why Douglass must use the language, the cultural references, the ideas of white people in order to tell his narrative of enslavement. The fact that Douglass learned to read and write, to “speak eloquently” (which reeks of respectability politics), makes him worthy of telling the story. The dual use of his education and experience, which is told to us by the first two letters by white men, put in context the contradictory nature of the validation of Douglass’s experience. His experience was, in their words, nothing extraordinary, which meant he suffered no more and no less than the average slave, but his education also put him at a superior level. It is the very fact that Douglass is literate that makes his experience validated enough to be worth listening to and believing. If it were not the case, then slavery would have been done away with early on; if the testimony of every slave were just as valid as that of Douglass, then why wasn’t the whole country riled up against slavery? It is because Douglass is using the tool of the oppressor to communicate that white people find him qualified enough to relay his experience to them.

The second idea is that of the continuous need for the black community to partake in emotional and intellectual labor. It is Douglass who has to learn the vocabulary and medium of communication in order to reach white people; white people are waiting for this testimony, a passive expectation that the call to action will come to them, not that they must be the ones to initiate it. This is a narrative that continues to this day, in which black people must still put in the emotional and intellectual labor to explain to people what they are struggling with, to justify why they are suffering. This is perhaps further aggravated by the fact that American history, in the classrooms and textbooks, is white history. Black history in the United States is kept in the margins, so people are taught to be ignorant of the suffering of black people that made this country what it is today. This country was built on black labor and black suffering, yet their history is relegated to the sidelines, and because of how power structures work in the United States, that means black people must continue to explain to their oppressors what has been done to them. Essentially, black people must relive and exhibit their trauma in order to gain even the faintest recognition of their humanity. Douglass, by repeating the story of his life, by putting it on display to be applauded by white people, to be analyzed by white people, is doing the emotional and intellectual work that white people should be doing. His life becomes an artifact to be studied in order to bring awareness to the plight of enslaved black people, when it should be white people, who created the power structure in the first place, who deal with the issues, who should be at the very least aware of what circumstances and life experiences the system creates for the black community.

(I’ve attached this video of a black woman poet explaining, in some ways, how she has to navigate the different vocabulary and media of communication as related to her identity)

Jamila Lyiscott: 3 ways to speak English

Jamila Lyiscott is a “tri-tongued orator;” in her powerful spoken-word essay “Broken English,” she celebrates – and challenges – the three distinct flavors of English she speaks with her friends, in the classroom and with her parents. As she explores the complicated history and present-day identity that each language represents, she unpacks what it means to be “articulate.”

The Relevance of Du Bois’s SOULS OF BLACK FOLK in Today’s World

The most relevant point, and the most consistent in its relevancy, is perhaps Du Bois’s statement that “…being a problem is a strange experience.” This sentence highlights one of the main ways of handling problems in the United States (in general), which is to blame the victim. It’s not that Du Bois and the black community actually are a problem, but that the system, the oppressors, white people, have set up a narrative that pins the blame squarely on the black community. According to this narrative (and this narrative is American history, especially as is taught in classrooms), it is entirely the fault of the black community that they are poor, that they live ‘in the hood,’ that they are stupid, that they are unwilling to educate and better themselves (and additionally for not “appreciating” education when it is given to them, regardless of its quality), that they are unable to keep a proper family (that age old tale of the “absent black father”), and that they are incarcerated at such high rates, among many other things. Never is there a recognition that it is white supremacy that has created the circumstances in which black people suffer. The system, from its conception (reinforced and made most concrete during the era of slavery), was designed for white people to prevail at the expense of the black community (and I say white people as opposed to white men because white women have historically used their power, their white femininity, to further exploit and abuse black men and women). It is because of this systemic abuse of black people, of the abuse and exploitation of these people in the very foundation of American government and society, that it is black people who are perceived as being the problem, rather than the system.

The idea of the evolution of the goal of the black community was also interesting, and arguably a testament to the evolution of slavery. Freedom as a primary goal made sense to the enslaved black community, but with reconstruction and Jim Crow, it became obvious that the shackles had morphed from the institution of slavery to the institution of the government. It was not merely official channels that had morphed to continue to oppress black people, but the idea of black inferiority has become ingrained in American culture. It wasn’t just a part of the system, but it was part of being a good American to, in essence, “show the black man his place,” to remind black people, in every instance, in every aspect of their lives, of their inferiority. Slavery was abolished, but the power dynamic, the abuse of white (and white-passing) people, didn’t change. That black men and women start at a disadvantage is the main thread in the narrative of blackness in the United States (and I say main thread because the experience of blackness should not, in any way, be reduced to only its negatives). Du Bois brings up the idea of the whole group (that is, of black people) beginning in poverty. The ignorance of black people that he speaks of (ignorance through no fault of their own – in fact, it is ignorance forced upon them) meant that black people had several generations of catching up to do in a system already rigged to hold them back.

And yet there is something missing in this excerpt, which is perhaps understandable given that Du Bois is a man, and it is the gendered aspect of blackness. Blackness is stigmatized regardless of gender, but the struggles of black men and women differ. This can arguably be traced back to the extremely gendered roles of enslaved black men and women. Black women have more to work through, given that they are oppressed because of their race and their gender. It would be interesting to explore a more nuanced approach to the points Du Bois makes with the intersection of gender and sexuality, especially in the modern age.